You can have checks and balances in either system. In practice, presidents tend to be more powerful than prime ministers, because power is directly vested in a president whereas a prime minister is at the mercy of parliament. I take the perspective that presidential systems need stronger checks and balances to counter that, rather than that checks and balances are a feature of presidential systems. For example Finland and Germany are considered to have a parliamentary system, but do have a President, whose post is mostly ceremonial.
History of Parliamentarism Since ancient times, when societies were tribal, there were councils or a headman whose decisions were assessed by village elders.
Eventually, these councils have slowly evolved into the modern parliamentary system. In England, Simon de Montfort is remembered as one of the fathers of representative government for holding two famous parliaments.
In practice, King George I 's inability to speak English led the responsibility for chairing cabinet to go to the leading minister, literally the prime or first minister, Robert Walpole. The gradual democratisation of parliament with the broadening of the voting franchise increased parliament's role in controlling government, and in deciding who the king could ask to form a government.
By the nineteenth-century, the Great Reform Act of led to parliamentary dominance, with its choice invariably deciding who was prime minister and the complexion of the government.
Hence the use of phrases like Her Majesty's government or His Excellency's government. Such a system became particularly prevalent in older British dominions, many of whom had their constitutions enacted by the British parliament; examples include Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the Irish President system vs parliament system State and the Union of South Africa.
Some of these parliaments President system vs parliament system were reformed from, or were initially developed as distinct from their original British model: Democracy and parliamentarianism became increasingly prevalent in Europe in the years after World War Ipartially imposed by the democratic victors, Great Britain and France, on the defeated countries and their successors, notably Germany's Weimar Republic and the new Austrian Republic.
Nineteenth-century urbanisationthe Industrial Revolution and, modernism had already fuelled the political left's struggle for democracy and parliamentarianism for a long time. In the radicalised times at the end of World War I, democratic reforms were often seen as a means to counter popular revolutionary currents.
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
January Further information: Parliamentary procedure A parliamentary system may be either bicameralwith two chambers of parliament or houses or unicameralwith just one parliamentary chamber.
In the case of a bicameral parliament, this is usually characterised by an elected lower house that has the power to determine the executive government and an upper house which may be appointed or elected through a different mechanism from the lower house.
Scholars of democracy such as Arend Lijphart distinguish two types of parliamentary democracies: The Westminster system originates from the British Houses of Parliament. The Reichstag Building in BerlinGermany. The Consensus system is used in most Western European countries.
The Westminster system is usually found in the Commonwealth of Nations and countries which were influenced by the British political tradition. Some parliaments in this model are elected using a plurality voting system first past the postsuch as the United Kingdom, Canada, and India, while others use proportional representationsuch as Ireland and New Zealand.
The Australian House of Representatives is elected using instant-runoff votingwhile the Senate is elected using proportional representation through single transferable vote.
Regardless of which system is used, the voting systems tend to allow the voter to vote for a named candidate rather than a closed list. The Western European parliamentary model e.
Spain, Germany tends to have a more consensual debating system and usually has semi-circular debating chambers. Consensus systems have more of a tendency to use proportional representation with open party lists than the Westminster Model legislatures. The committees of these Parliaments tend to be more important than the plenary chamber.
Some West European countries' parliaments e. In countries using this system, Members of Parliament have to resign their place in Parliament upon being appointed or elected minister. Ministers in those countries usually actively participate in parliamentary debates, but, are not entitled to vote.
Implementations of the parliamentary system can also differ on the manner of how the prime minister and government are appointed and as to whether the government needs the explicit approval of the parliament, rather than just the absence of its disapproval.
Some countries such as India also require the prime minister to be a member of the legislature, though in other countries this only exists as a convention. The head of state appoints a prime minister who will likely have majority support in parliament.
While in practice most prime ministers under the Westminster system including Australia, Canada, India, New Zealand and the United Kingdom are the leaders of the largest party in parliament, technically the appointment of the prime minister is a prerogative exercised by the monarch, the governor-general, or the president.
No parliamentary vote takes place on who is forming a government, but since parliament can immediately defeat the government with a motion of no confidencethe head of state is limited by convention to choosing a candidate who can command the confidence of parliament, and thus has little or no influence in the decision.
The head of state appoints the leader of the political party holding a plurality of seats in parliament as prime minister. For example, in Greece, if no party has a majority, the leader of the party with a plurality of seats is given an exploratory mandate to receive the confidence of the parliament within three days.
If this is not possible, then the leader of the party with the second highest seat number is given the exploratory mandate.A semi-presidential system or dual executive system is a system of government in which a president exists alongside a prime minister and a cabinet, with the latter being responsible for the legislature of a state.
Oct 28, · The main difference between a parliamentary and presidential system of government is that in a presidential system, the president is separate from the legislative body, but in a parliamentary system, the chief executive, such as a prime minister, is part of the legislative body, or parliament.
The PM is often times not directly elected, it is left up to Parliament Presidentialist Advantage: Regime stability and less of of a governmental presence The President is often directly elected or elected by an electoral college in which the members represent small municipalities.
Presidential Government VS Parliamentary Government Canada and the U.S. are ruled under two different political systems of government which are parliamentary government and presidential government.
With the exception of the United States, where a system of separation of executive and legislative powers exists, all countries that are considered to be stable democracies adopt a constitution that is, at least partially, parliamentary.
Transcript of Presidential vs. Parliamentary System of Government. Presidential vs.
Parliamentary System Which is better? A system of government in which the president is constitutionally independent of the legislature and is the head of the executive branch.